Review My Portfolio
Add companies you already hold or are already tracking. Verdict™ scores each one on the same 12-dimension PitchScore™ pipeline a founder gets, and only you ever see the result.
4
Companies added
0
In progress
4
Scored
Global · Pro
T
Tidewater Tutors
66.40
PitchScore™
Elevator Pitch↓64
Problem↓70
Solution↓68
Demo↓61
Founder’s Mindset™↓67
Market↓65
Business Model↓63
Traction↓66
Moat↓60
Team↓72
Financials↓62
Cap Table↓74
Why these scores
Elevator Pitch ↓64 · Asserted — Warm story, soft ask; proceeds unstated.
Problem ↓70 · Indicated — Tuition-centre admin load documented from the founder's own centre.
Solution ↓68 · Indicated — Scheduling module live in one centre; parent app mocked.
Demo ↓61 · Asserted — Screens shown; the live centre wasn't demoed.
Founder’s Mindset™ ↓67 · Indicated — Founder ran the centre this replaces — pricing instincts real, plan thin.
Market ↓65 · Asserted — Centre count cited; willingness to pay assumed.
Business Model ↓63 · Asserted — Per-student pricing proposed; the pilot centre pays nothing.
Traction ↓66 · Indicated — One centre live daily, unpaid; two more verbally committed.
Moat ↓60 · Asserted — No defensibility named beyond first-mover in the neighbourhood.
Team ↓72 · Indicated — Founder-operator plus a contract developer.
Financials ↓62 · Asserted — Financials extrapolate one centre's costs.
Cap Table ↓74 · Proven — Founder-owned, no notes outstanding.
Global · Pro
L
Latchkey Security
81.60
PitchScore™
Elevator Pitch↑82
Problem↑84
Solution↑83
Demo↑78
Founder’s Mindset™↑80
Market↑79
Business Model↑83
Traction↑85
Moat↑77
Team↑82
Financials↑80
Cap Table↑81
Why these scores
Elevator Pitch ↑82 · Proven — One-line wedge ('SOC 2 for the shophouse economy'); ask allocated by function.
Problem ↑84 · Proven — Audit-failure costs pulled from nine clients' remediation invoices.
Solution ↑83 · Indicated — Control automation demoed on live client tenants; coverage map honest about gaps.
Demo ↑78 · Indicated — Product tour on real data; auditor-facing export shown once.
Founder’s Mindset™ ↑80 · Indicated — Founder reasons in CAC payback and names the segment they refuse to serve.
Market ↑79 · Indicated — Regional SME compliance spend sized bottom-up; regulation tailwind documented.
Business Model ↑83 · Proven — Tiered subscription billing 18 clients; pricing page matches invoices.
Traction ↑85 · Proven — 18 paying clients, 9 distribution partners, retention curve attached.
Moat ↑77 · Indicated — Auditor-network relationships compound; switching-cost proof is early.
Team ↑82 · Proven — Second-time founders; prior compliance tool exited to a named acquirer.
Financials ↑80 · Indicated — Model names churn and CAC assumptions; both tracked monthly.
Cap Table ↑81 · Proven — Priced seed, standard docs, tidy.
Global · Pro
C
Cinder Bakehouse
58.20
PitchScore™
Elevator Pitch↓52
Problem↓63
Solution↓60
Demo↓48
Founder’s Mindset™↓62
Market↓58
Business Model↓55
Traction↓57
Moat↓49
Team↓68
Financials↓51
Cap Table↓72
Why these scores
Elevator Pitch ↓52 · Asserted — Story-led open; the ask never states a number.
Problem ↓63 · Indicated — Wholesale bakery margins are thin and documented; whose problem this solves is fuzzier.
Solution ↓60 · Asserted — Dark-bakery model described; no unit has run a full quarter.
Demo ↓48 · Asserted — Photos and a floor plan; nothing operating to show.
Founder’s Mindset™ ↓62 · Indicated — Founder knows food-service ops cold; capital plan is hopeful.
Market ↓58 · Asserted — City demand asserted from delivery-app growth, unsized.
Business Model ↓55 · Asserted — Pricing sketched; contribution margin per unit not computed.
Traction ↓57 · Asserted — LOIs from three cafés; no recurring orders yet.
Moat ↓49 · Asserted — No moat beyond recipes and hustle, said almost verbatim.
Team ↓68 · Indicated — Operator-founder with a decade in commissary kitchens.
Financials ↓51 · Asserted — Financials are a single revenue line and rent.
Cap Table ↓72 · Indicated — Simple table, founder-owned.
Global · Pro
P
Palmetto OS
79.80
PitchScore™
Elevator Pitch↑78
Problem↑82
Solution↑80
Demo↑75
Founder’s Mindset™↑79
Market↑77
Business Model↑81
Traction↑83
Moat↓74
Team↑80
Financials↑78
Cap Table↑81
Why these scores
Elevator Pitch ↑78 · Indicated — Hook lands ('the back office your franchisees never hire') and the ask is sized, though use of proceeds stays coarse.
Problem ↑82 · Proven — Franchisee admin hours measured across nine locations in the pilot chain — the problem carries timesheets.
Solution ↑80 · Indicated — Workflow coverage demoed store by store; the 'runs the whole back office' claim outruns the shipped module list.
Demo ↑75 · Indicated — Product walkthrough on live pilot data; two of five modules shown, the rest storyboarded.
Founder’s Mindset™ ↑79 · Indicated — Founder quotes payback per store from memory and has killed one pricing model already — decisive, thinly documented.
Market ↑77 · Indicated — Franchise count is registry-sourced; expansion beyond food service is asserted rather than sized.
Business Model ↑81 · Proven — Per-store subscription live in the pilot chain; contract and pricing sheet attached.
Traction ↑83 · Proven — Nine paying stores with three months of usage; expansion into the chain's next region signed.
Moat ↓74 · Asserted — Stickiness argued from workflow depth; no lock-in evidence yet beyond the pilot's goodwill.
Team ↑80 · Indicated — Founding pair ran franchise operations themselves; first engineer verified, no growth function yet.
Financials ↑78 · Indicated — Store-level unit economics disclosed; company-level model extrapolates from a single chain.
Cap Table ↑81 · Proven — Two founders, one angel note, clean caps — nothing to renegotiate before a seed.
Add your startup
Live accounts only